Some excellence…

It’s been a while since I put anything up on here, so I thought I’d break the silence with a little compendium of excellence. There is nothing as inspiring as seeing people at the top of their game doing what they do best. Here, then, is a series of clips of excellent people doing excellent things excellently. Enjoy…

A card trick to start. Ricky Jay is the world’s foremost sleight-of-hand man. This brief trick is about as good as card tricks get…

It’s impossible to talk about excellence without mentioning Bach very early on. Here Glenn Gould plays the Aria from the Goldberg Variations in a 1981 recording…

Aaron Sorkin writes the best dialogue I’ve ever heard. This clip is the “cold open” or pre-credits sequence from an episode of the West Wing. Sorkin writes it fast and layered and manages to take a few side-swipes at bad writing along the way before wrapping the whole thing up in a little bow before the credits…

Al Pacino once said that Mark Rylance makes Shakespeare sound as if it was written that afternoon with him in mind. This is a clip of Rylance playing Richard II at the Globe Theatre. I don’t know anyone who can make Shakespeare sound so organic or who can find new interpretations of well known speeches such that you feel you’ve never heard them before…

Countless books and movies have charted the course of human relationships. In Citizen Kane, Orson Welles gives us ten years of marriage in two minutes and provides a masterclass in screenwriting…

That’s today’s little collection. I hope these clips inspire something. I’d love any recommendations people may have for the next set.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in General Crap, Recommendations | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

What the… Who the… Where the fuck am I?

The answer is Hargrave, Northamptonshire, a tiny village on the way to the in-laws’ place. We were encouraged to stop off at Hargrave because they’re mounting a ‘Scarecrow Festival’ this weekend. I had no idea what to expect…

These pictures tell the story. Bear in mind that much of the village was deserted, lending a John Wyndham feel to proceedings. Every now and then you’d look over at a manicured lawn or step into the empty church and this is what you’d find…

I may never sleep well again.

P1010091

P1010089

P1010090

P1010092

P1010093

P1010094

P1010095

P1010096

P1010097

P1010098

P1010100

P1010102 P1010103

P1010106

P1010109

I’m going back to London tomorrow. The countryside freaks me out.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in General Crap, Journal | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Visual genius

Stuck in a creative rut? I often find it helps to reacquaint myself with the music video work of Michel Gondry. These are pure visual ideas of the kind that would make your head explode if you thought about them for too long and they are also a good reminder of the power of the imagination and the value of thinking a long way outside the box.

Watch them, they will inspire…

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Directing, Recommendations | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Beginnings…

I’m going back to 1994 or thereabouts. I can’t be more specific. I have no record of this; no paperwork, no tapes, nothing.

I was 22 years old. I’d just finished the last in a succession of crappy jobs selling advertising space for magazines you never heard of and it was time to do something with my life. I’m already editorialising with the benefit of hindsight; time to do something with my life? Probably not then, more likely I was looking for an excuse not to wear a suit and go to an office everyday. Maybe I’m still doing that.

I decided I was going to make a film. That was what I wanted to do, I wanted to make films. I’d wanted to make films since I was about eleven years old. Go to film school? I couldn’t afford it and I didn’t really believe in it. I didn’t think I could learn anything in a classroom that I couldn’t learn better and faster by doing. I still believe that about pretty much everything (although, if you’re about to operate on me, I’d love you to have passed some exams).

I was going to make a film. A short film, obviously, let’s not run before we can crawl. I’d directed a couple of plays in school but I knew that really didn’t count for anything. I’d never written a script, I’d never been on a film set, much less worked on one and I’d never even met anyone who worked in the film industry. I didn’t have a single thing going for me. Okay, maybe one thing; I was 22 years old and I didn’t know what I didn’t know and I had no idea what I wasn’t supposed to be able to do.

Films cost money. Even short films. Even if you don’t pay anyone and you beg, borrow or steal as much as you can, some things still need to be paid for. I didn’t have any money. None. I’d been earning well but spending better; I’d quit my job on a Friday and by Monday I was in overdraft. This continues to be the story of my life.

I enrolled on the film and theatre studies course at the University of North London (the film and theatre department is now a Pizza Express and certainly far more useful for that). By enrolling I automatically received a grant, which I could live on, and became eligible for a student loan which I could use to fund my magnum opus. (By now you may be wondering how I got accepted into university so fast and you may be starting to suspect that the timeframe doesn’t quite work… Let’s not you and I allow the facts to get in the way of a good story.)

The grant was roughly a thousand pounds and the student loan was about the same amount. I signed the papers and got the money. I think I attended two lectures; one film, one theatre studies. I went along more out of guilt than interest; they’d given me this money, I should at least show willing. Waste of time. Don’t let anyone tell you different. If you’re reading this and you’re currently studying for a BA in film and theatre studies, walk away. Those people have nothing useful to tell you. This is three years of your life you’re not getting back. Run while you still can.

So now I had the money. I didn’t have a script, actors, crew, equipment or even an idea for a story but I had the money. At this stage I was therefore incompetent as an artist but brilliant as a producer.

So what did I have? I was sharing a house with a friend of mine in Chelsea. If the friend went away for a weekend, I would have an empty house. An empty house is a location, a location I’m already paying a paltry amount of rent for. The film should therefore be set in a house in Chelsea that looked remarkably similar to this one. Tick that box and move on.

The aforementioned housemate was a brilliant cook and she used to like to organise dinner parties at our place to which I was, unavoidably, invited. One of these happened while I was still trying to come up with a story. I happened to mention over the starter that I had quit my job and was going to make a short film and the consensus amongst the City workers and trustafarians at the table was that I had just made a huge mistake and was about to fall flat on my face and who the fuck did I think I was? Quentin Tarantino? As I stared down at the untouched wild mushroom risotto on my plate, Lloyd was born…

Lloyd was my feelings at that moment made corporeal. Lloyd finds himself at a dinner party in Chelsea with a bunch of smug, self-regarding yahoos and he fantasises about killing each one of them in the most brutal manner imaginable. He snaps out of his reverie to find that the guests have indeed all been killed, exactly as he imagined. Did he do it, or is someone else responsible?

I know, it’s a pretty shitty premise but it was something and it could probably sustain fifteen minutes of screen time. More to the point, it was a framework that allowed for some decent dialogue and some good set pieces in various parts of the house as Lloyd isolates and kills each guest in turn.

All I had to do was to turn this idea into a fifteen page screenplay. I had no idea how to do that. The obvious solution was to trot down to Waterstones and buy one of the too-numerous books on the ‘art’ of screenplay writing. But even back then it seemed screamingly obvious to me that anyone who had the time to write a book about how to write screenplays wasn’t making a great success of a screenwriting career. I knew what a play script should look like and could therefore make a decent guess at what a film script might need. I set up a Word template and started to bash out my story. I can’t remember how long it took but I suspect I was slower writing those fifteen pages than I would be writing an hour of TV today. And this was pre-Twitter.

The script complete (not good, you understand, but complete – someone recently told me that the mark of the professional writer is the ability to say “that’ll do”), I now needed to assemble a cast and crew. I had a few friends at drama school so I made some calls and got them and some of their mates to give up a weekend. I put a notice up at the National Film and Television School and got a Director of Photography from there who then helped me to assemble a student crew who wanted experience and free sandwiches more than they wanted actual money.

I tinkered with the script, held production meetings where I asked more questions than any of the crew and worked out a schedule.

The film, which was now called “Any Dream Will Do” was shot on 16mm film over the course of an exhausting but exhilarating weekend. Midway through the first day, a gunshot effect went wrong and an actress ended up in A&E with burns on her arm. She made it back a couple of hours later but now had a bandage on her arm which screwed continuity quite badly, necessitating a major change to the plot and a last minute re-write. We battled time and budgetary constraints on every shot of every scene for two days but we got it done after a fashion and wrapped about ten minutes before my housemate got home from her weekend away.

I made a bunch of calls and managed to get the rushes graded for free in the middle of the night at a Soho post-house. While I was there, I met an editor who agreed to cut the picture for nothing, again in the middle of the night. I don’t recall mixing the sound so I’m guessing we probably never did that properly.

Over those few months of writing, shooting and editing I learned more than I would have learned in three years at film school.

I learned that the script is not an absolute, it is a blueprint that evolves through the shooting and editing as smart people have good ideas and that, as a writer and director, it’s your job to assess those ideas and use the ones that will make the finished product better. Also, that good ideas don’t respect hierarchy; they’re as likely to come from the runner as from the producer.

I learned that it’s easy to be a good director in the morning but that what really separates the men from the boys is how you deal with the last half hour of the day when you’re running out of time and you still have important shots to make. The old film industry adage “Ben Hur in the morning, Benny Hill in the afternoon” is always true.

I learned that directing is about management as well as creativity, that the director is responsible for the atmosphere on a set and therefore the pace and quality of the work. For me, at least, a fun atmosphere produces better results than an atmosphere of tension and oppression. Praise produces better results than censure.

Nowadays, with the ready availability of decent domestic cameras and editing software, conventional wisdom has it that anyone has the means to make a film and that this democratisation of the process will produce a new generation of Spielbergs and Scorceses. This is largely bullshit. Yes, it’s possible to pick up a cheap HD camera, go shoot a movie with your friends and edit it on Final Cut on your laptop. If the technology had been available at the time, that’s probably how I would have made “Any Dream Will Do”. And I would have learned almost nothing useful. Yes, I might have figured out which shots cut together best or when to use a close-up, when to use a wide shot. But really, if I didn’t already have an idea of that I shouldn’t be making a film in the first place. I would have learned nothing that would equip me for a career making films and television; I would have no idea of the responsibilities of the various departments, the subtleties of managing a crew, the evolution of ideas through process and necessity, the trade-off between those ideas and the time available to execute them. In short, I would have collected none of the skills required to do this job in the real world. Just as, I contest, the film school graduate can learn none of these skills until the safety net of the institution has been removed and he or she is required to do the job in a professional capacity.

And as for the film itself? Was “Any Dream Will Do” any good? I doubt it but I can’t really answer that question now as I haven’t seen the film for at least ten years. I don’t have a copy of the film and I’ve no idea if anyone does. I’m pretty sure it’s not the worst thing I’ve ever made because I directed “Hotel Babylon” a few years back and there is no pile of crap bigger or stinkier than the two episodes that bear my name.

So “Any Dream Will Do” is long lost and I have no interest in watching it again. The film was about the process; the journey, not the destination. If I’m proud of any aspect of it it’s that I did it at all. It would have been so easy to accept that making a film was too high a mountain to climb, that my ignorance was insurmountable and that I’d be better off turning my back on the idea and heading instead to another dull office job. Only I know how easy it would have been to walk away, how tempting that was on how many occasions. But I didn’t.

However bad the end product, I made it. I made a film and now I get paid to make them. There’s isn’t a better job in the world.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Directing, Writing | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

Best Desktop Twitter Apps

This is not quite the post I was promising. I said I was going to review a variety of desktop applications for Twitter, draw the comparisons and give some idea of which were the best.

At the time I meant it.

Now I’ve done the research and I’ve had a better idea.

For “better” read “easier”.

There are some people out there who have really devoted a lot of time and energy to exploring all the nooks and crannies of the various Twitter clients available. I was never going to do that, was I? I was just going to give each one a cursory glance and say whether I thought it was pretty or not. I’m not going to do that anymore. I’m going to tell you which ones I use and why and how I came to use them, then I’m going to throw out some links to proper, in-depth reviews of the best clients and let you make up your own minds.

I’m a Mac user, so I really can’t say anything particularly useful about Twitter apps for Windows. Several of the ones I’ll talk about are cross-platform and I’m sure there are some great Windows applications available (I know, I laughed as I typed that) but I don’t know anything about them because I’m not an accountant.

So, where to begin? Let’s start with the web. Not web apps, because that’s a separate post as well (I’m really getting out of doing any work here at all) but the Twitter home page itself. Don’t go there. Stop using it immediately. It’s a clunky, slow, badly designed pain in the arse. The Twitter home page should only be visited when your application of choice has hit its allotted 100 updates per hour and you need to keep up with the Twitter stream until it resets. Otherwise, avoid. You don’t go to BBC TV Centre to watch television so don’t go to the Twitter home page to tweet. Any decent application should be able to handle tweets, @replies, Direct Messages and all the machinations of following and being followed with no problem at all. The only other legitimate reason to visit the home page is when you need to adjust settings/change your photo etc.

The first desktop Twitter app I used was called Spaz. I’m not going to lie; I didn’t do extensive comparisons to arrive at this choice, I chose it because the name made me giggle. At the time Spaz (hee hee) was a pretty good desktop client; basic, functional and easy to use. When I say “at the time” it sounds as if I’m talking about some dim distant time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth. I’m actually talking about six months ago; Twitter apps are evolving very fast indeed right now.

I don’t imagine anyone really uses Spaz anymore. There’s nothing really wrong with it and the name still makes me smile but it lacks the pleasing aesthetics and functionality of more recent applications. Crucially, it also does nothing to enhance the Twitter experience. I moved from the wed to Spaz and my Twitter use, which was already almost non-existent, didn’t increase in any marked way.

The application that made Twitter for me and, I suspect many other people, was Tweetdeck. Ian Dodgson’s brilliant application runs on Adobe Air and has cross-platform compatibility. So many people have said they didn’t ‘get’ Twitter until they started using Tweetdeck and that’s certainly true for me. Tweetdeck’s genius lies in its column view and ability to create groups; rather than watch every tweet from every one of your followers scroll by like so much white noise, TD (bored of typing it out in full now) allows you to select your favourite people (or family, work colleagues, whatever) and create groups for them which you can see alongside the main feed. That means you read more of what’s written, can easily keep track of conversations and find yourself much more satisfyingly immersed in the ebbs and flows of the Twitterverse. With built-in URL shortening, Twitpic integration and a host of other really useful little functions, Tweetdeck is still the application by which all others are judged and still seems to be the most popular app for the heavier Twitter user.

1E1AC7D9-E4FF-4A30-B996-4AFBA4A2EA30.jpg

Tweetdeck also changed Twitter in a subtle way. Before the ability to group, Twitter took the form of a series of mostly disconnected statements and observations in 140 characters; a snapshot of the world at any given moment. By giving the user the chance to highlight some of the voices within the noise, Tweetdeck turned Twitter into a conversation. Imagine a huge party with hundreds of thousands of guests all talking at once; Tweetdeck gives you the ability to go into the kitchen, pour a glass of wine and chat to a handful of people for a while. Other guests might come in and join and some people might leave but the background noise is dulled for a while and Twitter becomes a place that people want to spend time, not just a service to post updates to.

Back then, I remember thinking that Tweetdeck was the best Twitter would ever get, that I would never want another Twitter application (‘back then’ was about two weeks ago).

If Tweetdeck has one drawback, other than the teething problems that are going to plague any new piece of software in the early stages, it’s that it looks like shit. Really. It’s about the ugliest piece of software I’ve seen since I was a Windows user. I know that shouldn’t really be a primary concern and it’s certainly true that TD’s functionality and level of innovation far outweighs aesthetic considerations but what if another application came along that did everything Tweetdeck did but looked nice too…?

D06890E2-0ACE-49C2-AFEC-CEEB5F0CD10B.jpg

Nambu is that application. Like all the best software, it’s Mac-only (do let me know the second this begins to sound smug and biased, by the way. No? It’s fine? Sure? Okay, I’ll carry on then.) Nambu allows groups but it has three view-options, TD-like columns being one of them, it thread replies after a fashion and it colour-codes replies. It’s not as stable as Tweetdeck but it hasn’t been around as long and will get better with time.

The flipside of the Nambu coin is Seesmic Desktop, another Adobe Air based application, which came to my attention at about the same time. It is another Tweetdeck alternative and works with Windows too. The problem with Seesmic is that it seems to offer nothing that isn’t already provided by Tweetdeck and is every bit as ugly albeit in a different way.

The weird thing about my Twitter usage is that, having been transformed by Tweetdeck’s and then Nambu’s ability to group people and thread conversations, my current application-of-choice doesn’t allow groups at all…

Tweetie is the best looking, most solid Twitter desktop app I have ever used. When I first downloaded it, I didn’t think it would work for me because it wouldn’t let me group my friends together away from the rest of the noise. Then I grew up. I realised that it’s up to me to follow people I find interesting; that inviting a load of people over for a party and then only talking to five of them is a pretty shitty way to behave and that there is a way to interact with Twitter that actually opens you up to meeting new people and engaging with them.

2743199F-4659-4CEB-B1BC-3AB039AD914F.jpg

I love Tweetie, from the way in animates the opening of Twitpics to the ability to thread conversations to the button that lets you know if someone is following you. Every time I try using something else, I run back to Tweetie within minutes. I don’t miss replies and, because it can thread conversations, I can still keep up with people but I’m no longer ignoring everyone else. With Tweetie, if I follow you, I see your tweets. If I don’t like them, I have the option to unfollow. So far I have only unfollowed two people though so that’s not bad going.

So, in conclusion, get off the web and get the proper Twitter experience with Tweetdeck, Nambu or Tweetie. The latter is my favourite by far and I cannot ever envisage changing… Well, until next week maybe.

As promised at the top of this post, the lovely people at Smoking Apples have posted some fine reviews of Mac Twitter apps, some of which I haven’t covered here because I’m just too damn lazy:

Nambu and EventBox

Lounge and Twangler

Tweetie

I’ll write a piece soon on iPhone apps for Twitter and I’m also going to research web apps. I’ve also promised a piece on the ‘rules of twitter use’. If you have an opinion on any of these things or you’d like to add or amend anything in the above article, please leave a comment below.

Now go tweet.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Recommendations | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

The Best Cigarette

Haven’t posted for a few days. I’m working on a new post for you but, in the meantime, enjoy a little sublime moment courtesy of former US Poet Laureate Billy Collins, animation by David Vaio:

This video was shown to me by Itxaso

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in General Crap | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Brandenburg Concertos

More excellence, you lucky people (as well as a chance to redeem yourselves for visiting a page about tits a record-breaking number of times!)

Here is Nikolaus Harnoncourt, a hero of mine, performing Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No.3 in G Major (BWV 1048) with Concentus Musicus Wien.

Relax and enjoy…

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Recommendations | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

David Lynch: Fishing For Ideas…

More exposure to excellence here (it’s good for you, suck it up). Very few people understand the possibilities of cinema like David Lynch. He’s just started David Lynch Foundation Television. Here are some clips from that, loosely themed around the desire for ideas. There’s a lot more where these came from; go see…

Ideas are like fish:

Checking Ideas with the Air:

The Meaning of His Films:

The Language of Cinema:


  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Directing, Recommendations, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment